<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Multiple Domains &#8211; Same Site, Different Names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.best-seo-blog.com/2009/10/22/seo-multiple-domains-same-site-different-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.best-seo-blog.com/2009/10/22/seo-multiple-domains-same-site-different-names/</link>
	<description>Launch your site.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:50:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.best-seo-blog.com/2009/10/22/seo-multiple-domains-same-site-different-names/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.best-seo-blog.com/?p=553#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Can users derive unique value from each site?  If so, you&#039;re probably okay (assuming nothing else is wrong).

If not, then you should work on providing unique user value/experiences for each site.

If you don&#039;t do that you might still be okay.  It&#039;s up to the search engines to decide for themselves what they will tolerate.

All an SEO can really do is advise you to take a very conservative approach to minimize the risk of violating search engine guidelines.

I can&#039;t really offer better feedback than that but I hope it proves helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can users derive unique value from each site?  If so, you&#8217;re probably okay (assuming nothing else is wrong).</p>
<p>If not, then you should work on providing unique user value/experiences for each site.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t do that you might still be okay.  It&#8217;s up to the search engines to decide for themselves what they will tolerate.</p>
<p>All an SEO can really do is advise you to take a very conservative approach to minimize the risk of violating search engine guidelines.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t really offer better feedback than that but I hope it proves helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mohit115</title>
		<link>http://www.best-seo-blog.com/2009/10/22/seo-multiple-domains-same-site-different-names/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>mohit115</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.best-seo-blog.com/?p=553#comment-265</guid>
		<description>I agree with lot of your points, and this is the kind of guidance I was looking forward to. I have a question though.
Basically, we have a hotel website that has over 200 hotels in it. Now, we bought around 15 other domains which connect to the same database as the primary website, but displays each hotel in a separate manner. As in, some sites, you can reserve thru quick registration, other sites have more detailed information, in some the booking options are different, some sites will just have the five star hotels, etc.
So, although we are using multiple website for the same content (database), the purpose is to give users various choices, which he might not get from one single site. 
Please guide me if this is advisable. 
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with lot of your points, and this is the kind of guidance I was looking forward to. I have a question though.<br />
Basically, we have a hotel website that has over 200 hotels in it. Now, we bought around 15 other domains which connect to the same database as the primary website, but displays each hotel in a separate manner. As in, some sites, you can reserve thru quick registration, other sites have more detailed information, in some the booking options are different, some sites will just have the five star hotels, etc.<br />
So, although we are using multiple website for the same content (database), the purpose is to give users various choices, which he might not get from one single site.<br />
Please guide me if this is advisable.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
